What might the simple home mouse be attempting to inform us?

Feedback is New Scientist’s popular sideways take a look at the current science and innovation news. You can send products you think might entertain readers to Feedback by emailing [email protected]

What’s in a squeak?

Feedback’s experience of mice is unfortunately restricted to the dead ones (or, often, hardly alive ones)that a person of our felines demands bringing into your house. This indicates we have actually heard more than our reasonable share of squeaks.

We were taken aback to find out that mouse squeaks have actually been nearly totally overlooked by science. Press reporter Alex Wilkins ensures us that it holds true, having actually checked out a current research study in Biology Letters entitled “Hidden in plain noise: the clinical capacity of home mouse squeaks”.

The thrust is that research studies of home mouse vocalisations have actually concentrated on ultrasonic noises that people can’t hear. Perhaps these felt unique and unexpected, so they took the spotlight. The authors state, audible squeaks “have actually gotten less attention”, leading to a “lack in squeak-focused research study”.

This is plainly an error. The squeak has “substantial clinical capacity”, they state, since “the degree to which squeaks communicate details about the vocalizer and impact listener behaviour throughout various social contexts has yet to be completely studied”.

Feedback believes squeaks are an extremely efficient interaction. We remember from checking out Terry Pratchett that the grim reaperish character referred to as the Death of Rats might communicate a lot with a well-chosen SQUEAK. Perhaps we require a motto. What do we desire? SQUEAK. When do we desire it? SQUEAK!

Puninative determinism

Often nominative determinism comes at us in a somewhat ambiguous method.

Paul Meara mentions that a current function on body clocks (2 August, p 30) included Angela RelÓgio, a scientist at MSH Medical School Hamburg in Germany, who is likewise the ceo of a business called TimeTeller.

Feedback does not speak Portuguese, or we would have understood, as Paul does, that “relÓgio” suggests “clock”.

Feedback is mindful that there are years of research study into the function of a protein called amyloid in Alzheimer’s illness.

We were for that reason much more surprised to discover that the UK’s University of Dundee has an Alzheimer’s expert called, er, Amy Lloyd.

Hard as nails

On 18 September, the most crucial rewards in the clinical calendar were revealed in a scientist-studded event: the Ig Nobels. These notoriously commemorate whimsical and unusual research study that however has significance. Or, as the developers of the occasion put it, “accomplishments so unexpected that they make individuals LAUGH, then THINK”.

Feedback didn’t go to the occasion. Thankfully the whole program is readily available to see online.

Of the different awards, we were most interested by the Literature reward. This was provided to instructor and clinician William Bennett Bean (1909-1989), “for constantly taping and examining the rate of development of among his fingernails over a duration of 35 years”.

His deal with this consisted of a 1953 research study, entitled merely “A note on fingernail development”, in which Bean set out “observations made over the previous 10 years”.

Numerous more in a comparable vein followed, culminating in 1980’s magnum opus “Nail Growth. Thirty-Five Years of Observation”, released in the Archives of Internal MedicineFeedback got this climactic nail paper and chewed our method through it.

Bean explains his research study as “a long record of the development of human deciduous tissue” that “offers a gradually moving keratin kymograph that determines age on the inexorable abscissa of time”.

What of the findings? Bean’s very first discovery was that the numerous nails grow at rates that are various, which this corresponds gradually.

“In easy terms, toe nails grow more gradually than nails of the hand, and the nail of the middle finger grows more quickly than the nails of either the thumb or the little finger or the other 2 middle fingers. By determining one nail, the rate of development can be computed for all.” After that, the discoveries acquired at about the speed nails grow.

Some aspects, nevertheless, can trigger a noticeable slowing down of nail development. Bean had the mumps in 1950 and this triggered a “chose downturn”, however after he recuperated “there was a countervailing speed-up”. He determined long-lasting downturn. “The typical day-to-day development of the left thumbnail, for example, has actually differed from 0.123 mm a day throughout the very first part of the research study when I was 32 years of age to 0.095 mm a day at the age of 67.”

Our only concern is why it has actually taken the Ig Nobels so long to provide Bean a reward, when he was so plainly an Ig-worthy scientist.

Other rewards went to research study into “the level to which a particular sort of lizard picks to consume particular type of pizza”, “what a nursing child experiences when the infant’s mom consumes garlic” and “whether cows painted with zebra-like striping can prevent being bitten by flies”.

Feedback especially values the Chemistry reward, granted for looking for out whether consuming food improved with indigestible Teflon makes you feel complete on less calories, a task that sounds a horrible lot like an alcohol-fuelled attempt. An experiment on rats recommended it works and is non-toxic, however we want to warn readers not to attempt this in your home.

To be on the safe side, possibly we must simply bulk up our food with powdered nail filings.

Got a story for Feedback?

You can send out stories to Feedback by e-mail at [email protected]. Please include your home address. Today’s and previous Feedbacks can be seen on our site.